Obligatory Lieberman comment
We don't much care for Democrats, and Joe Lieberman is pretty much the reason why. Therefore, it comes as some relief that he lost his primary election.
Lieberman has enabled Bush to turn a flawed government into a nightmare. He deserves to spend the rest of his days as a Fox News contributor.
He'll run as an independent, and he'll lose again. And Ned Lamont will undoubtedly prove a disappointment to "liberal" Democrats and morph into Barak Obama (not in a good way with all that charisma, but in a bad way with all that fellating of business interests).
That said, we woke up to a truly bizarre reading of the Lieberman accusation that hackers took down his web site. Amy Robach, bubble-headed MSNBC newsreader, apparently wanted to cast the "hacking" story in a direction other than the very obvious answer that Lieberman's campaign relied on a cheap web service that was unable to handle the traffic and subsequently shut down.
Robach's guest was Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. Her first belligerent question posed to the Attorney General was intoned as an indictment:
"Is there any doubt" that Joe Lieberman's web site was hacked on the eve of an election?
Richard Blumenthal was wise enough to respond that he was taking the charges seriously, but that yes, there was plenty of room for doubt.
Is this all part of MSNBC's attempt to snag some of that "trailer-trash pie"? How else could you explain Ann Coulter's calling Al Gore a "total fag" to the amusement of Chris Mathews, whose response was to gush about how he couldn't wait to have her back.
